Odaily Planet Daily News: In response to the recent $13 million attack on Hyperliquid, some Solana community members have raised questions about whether Jupiter's JLP risk library has similar vulnerabilities. Analysis suggests that Jupiter has a structural defense mechanism and is unlikely to encounter similar attacks. Firstly, Jupiter only supports mainstream assets with sufficient liquidity such as SOL, ETH, and wBTC, while Hyperliquid allows tokens with lower liquidity (such as JELLY) to be traded, making them easier to manipulate. Secondly, Hyperliquid relies on internal order book matching, allowing attackers to manipulate prices through limit orders, while Jupiter uses external oracle machines such as Pyth to provide prices, making it difficult to influence market prices through a single platform. In addition, Jupiter adopts strict risk control mechanisms, and all transactions are directly undertaken by JLP without involving secondary risk pools or manual intervention, ensuring the stability of transaction execution. Although JLP still needs to deal with risks such as unilateral market trends, it balances pool risks through dynamic adjustments of lending rates and other means. （Blockworks）
